Incident Response Policy template (SOC 2)
Defines how security incidents are reported, classified by severity, contained, resolved and reviewed, including customer, regulator and vendor notification obligations.
Policy P13 of 22 · Owner: Security Owner · 7 criteria in the crosswalk · Apache-2.0
What this policy is for
The Incident Response Policy is one of the 22 governance policies in the Policyseed set. It is owned by the Security Owner, approved by the executive you name in the intake, and reviewed on the cadence you choose. Like every policy in the set it has nine numbered sections: purpose, scope, roles, policy statements, procedures, exceptions, enforcement, review cadence and a revision history table. Sections 4 and 5 carry the substance; those are the sections the Audit Kit rewrites for your named tools.
SOC 2 criteria this policy addresses
The Policyseed crosswalk maps 7 criteria to this policy. Each row names the section an auditor would read for that criterion; the criterion pages explain what it asks in plain words and list evidence examples.
| Criterion | What it covers | Where in this policy |
|---|---|---|
| CC2.2 | Internal communication | Section 5 (Procedures) |
| CC2.3 | External communication | Section 5 (Procedures) |
| CC4.2 | Communicating deficiencies | Section 5 (Procedures) |
| CC7.2 | Monitoring for anomalies | Section 4 (Policy Statements) |
| CC7.3 | Evaluating security events | Section 5 (Procedures) |
| CC7.4 | Responding to incidents | Section 4 (Policy Statements), Section 5 (Procedures) |
| CC7.5 | Recovering from incidents | Section 5 (Procedures) |
Evidence auditors typically ask for
A policy is tested against artifacts. These are examples from the crosswalk for the criteria above, written for a small SaaS company; the Audit Kit ships the full list as an evidence checklist with an owner per row.
- Onboarding checklist showing policy distribution and security training as required steps
- Signed policy acknowledgment forms for every active employee
- Screenshot of the internal incident reporting channel or address referenced in the Incident Response Policy
- Announcement to staff when a policy is updated (email or chat message with date)
- Public security page or trust page URL and a dated screenshot
- Published privacy notice with the date it was last updated
- Customer incident notification template from the Incident Response Policy procedures
- Contract or DPA clause stating customer breach notification timelines
Full text: the Incident Response Policy rendered for Northwind Cloud Inc
Below is the complete template as the generator renders it for Northwind Cloud Inc, a fictional 11-50-person remote company running Northwind on AWS, Vercel, GitHub and Okta. Every name, tool and date comes from that sample intake; your answers replace them. Section headings carry anchors so the criterion pages can link straight to the section they cite.
Sample document
Northwind Cloud Inc Incident Response Policy
1. Purpose
This policy establishes how Northwind Cloud Inc prepares for, detects, responds to and recovers from security incidents affecting Northwind, its infrastructure and the information entrusted to Northwind Cloud Inc by customers, personnel and partners, so as to limit harm, restore normal operations quickly, meet notification obligations, preserve evidence, and turn every incident into a documented improvement.
2. Scope
This policy applies to all Northwind Cloud Inc personnel, including contractors and interns, and to every system and data set Northwind Cloud Inc owns or operates: production in AWS and Vercel, code and pipelines in GitHub and GitHub Actions, corporate SaaS, endpoints, and vendor services holding Northwind Cloud Inc data. It applies wherever personnel work, including home offices and travel.
A security event is any observable occurrence relevant to security. A security incident is an event that has, or is reasonably likely to have, compromised the confidentiality, integrity or availability of Northwind Cloud Inc systems or data. A data breach is an incident resulting in unauthorised access to, disclosure, alteration or loss of personal or customer data. Every incident is assigned one of these severity levels.
| Severity | Definition | Response targets | Notification |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEV1 - Critical | Confirmed exposure of customer data, attacker control of a production system, ransomware, or Northwind unavailable for most customers | Acknowledge in 15 minutes; Incident Commander in 30 minutes; containment under way in 1 hour; updates hourly | Executive Management immediately; customers and regulators per Section 5 |
| SEV2 - High | Likely compromise of one account or system, malware on an endpoint with production access, exposure of internal confidential data, or partial outage of Northwind | Acknowledge in 30 minutes; Incident Commander in 1 hour; containment in 4 hours; updates every 4 hours | Executive Management within 4 hours; affected customers |
| SEV3 - Moderate | Control failure with no confirmed exposure, phishing reported before credentials were entered, or an actively exploited vulnerability present in Northwind Cloud Inc systems | Acknowledge in 4 business hours; remediate in 5 business days; daily updates | Security Owner; quarterly incident report |
| SEV4 - Low | Negligible impact, such as a blocked scan, a false positive, or a lost device that was encrypted and wiped | Acknowledge in 2 business days; resolve in 30 days | Incident log only |
3. Roles and Responsibilities
- Executive Management approves this policy, is notified of SEV1 and SEV2 incidents, decides on customer and regulatory notification, engages outside counsel and insurers, and attends incident exercises.
- Security Owner (Dana Whitfield, CTO) owns this policy and the runbook, monitors security@northwindcloud.example, triages reports, appoints the Incident Commander, maintains the incident log, leads post-incident reviews and reports metrics.
- Incident Commander directs a given SEV1 or SEV2 response as the single decision-maker, setting priorities, assigning tasks, deciding containment actions and controlling the update cadence. The Security Owner fills the role unless someone else is appointed.
- Engineering staffs the on-call rotation, executes containment, eradication and recovery in AWS and Vercel, GitHub and related systems, preserves evidence, and implements corrective actions.
- People Operations supports incidents involving personnel, such as insider misuse or lost devices, runs any disciplinary process, and ensures incident-reporting training at onboarding and annually.
- All Personnel report suspected incidents to security@northwindcloud.example, cooperate with responders, preserve rather than delete potential evidence, and do not discuss incidents outside the response team.
4. Policy Statements
- 4.1 Anyone who observes or suspects a security incident must report it to security@northwindcloud.example within one hour of discovery. Good-faith reports are never penalised, even where the reporter caused the incident.
- 4.2 Every report is triaged and assigned a Section 2 severity within the acknowledgement target for that level; severity may be raised by any responder and lowered only by the Incident Commander with a written rationale.
- 4.3 Every SEV1 and SEV2 incident has a named Incident Commander with authority to take systems offline, revoke credentials, block traffic and engage vendors without prior approval; Executive Management is informed of containment decisions, not consulted first.
- 4.4 Every incident has a record in the incident log with a unique identifier, timestamped timeline, decisions, participants, affected systems and data, evidence and closure criteria, retained for seven years under the Data Retention and Disposal Policy.
- 4.5 Evidence, including logs in Datadog, cloud audit trails, snapshots and access records, is preserved before any remediation that could destroy it; evidence that may be needed in a dispute is kept in a restricted location with a chain-of-custody note.
- 4.6 Containment prioritises protecting customer data and people over restoring availability. Compromised credentials are rotated and sessions revoked in Okta as a first action; compromised hosts are isolated, not rebuilt, until evidence is captured.
- 4.7 Only Executive Management, or their designate for the incident, communicates about it with customers, the press, regulators, law enforcement or the public; personnel must not confirm, deny or speculate about incidents with third parties.
- 4.8 Affected customers are notified without undue delay, within any contractual timeframe, and in every case within 72 hours of Northwind Cloud Inc confirming their data was affected, stating what happened, what Northwind Cloud Inc has done and what the customer should do.
- 4.9 Legal, regulatory and contractual notification obligations are assessed for every SEV1 and SEV2 incident, with outside counsel where the analysis is unclear. Where personal data is involved, supervisory authorities are notified within 72 hours where the GDPR or UK GDPR applies, affected individuals and state attorneys general where US state breach-notification laws require it, and customers acting as data controllers in time to meet their own deadlines.
- 4.10 Incidents at vendors, including Supabase, Stripe, Datadog and Slack, that affect Northwind Cloud Inc data or Northwind are handled under this policy, and vendor contracts must require notification to Northwind Cloud Inc within 72 hours under the Vendor and Third-Party Risk Management Policy.
- 4.11 Every SEV1 and SEV2 incident receives a blameless post-incident review within five business days of closure that produces a root cause, impact statement and corrective actions with owners and due dates, tracked to closure and reported to Executive Management.
- 4.12 The plan is exercised at least annually with Executive Management, Engineering and the Security Owner, and all personnel complete incident-reporting training at onboarding and annually; exercise findings are entered in the risk register.
- 4.13 Where an incident threatens the availability of Northwind, the Incident Commander may invoke the Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Policy; the incident and recovery records reference each other so that one timeline exists.
5. Procedures
- 5.1 Detection and reporting. Incidents arrive from Datadog alerts, AWS and Vercel security notifications, secret-scanning and dependency alerts from GitHub, vendor notices, customer reports and personnel reports to security@northwindcloud.example. The on-call responder acknowledges each within the target for the suspected severity.
- 5.2 Triage. Within the acknowledgement target, the Security Owner or on-call responder confirms whether the event is an incident, assigns a severity (choosing the higher when facts are uncertain), opens a record with an identifier in the form INC-YYYY-NNN and, for SEV1 and SEV2, appoints the Incident Commander.
- 5.3 Mobilisation. The Incident Commander opens a channel named after the incident identifier, designates a scribe and, for SEV1 and SEV2, a communications lead, and sets the update cadence.
- 5.4 Containment. Responders first disable accounts and revoke sessions in Okta, rotate exposed keys and secrets, block malicious addresses, isolate affected hosts or containers in AWS and Vercel and remotely lock or wipe endpoints through Kandji. Longer-term containment, such as rebuilding hosts, is planned once spread is stopped, and each action and its time are recorded.
- 5.5 Evidence collection. Before eradication, responders snapshot affected volumes, export logs and cloud audit trails covering at least 30 days before the first indicator, capture attacker activity and preserve related messages and tickets in a restricted, access-logged location; large artefacts are hashed.
- 5.6 Eradication and recovery. Engineering removes the root cause, rebuilds compromised systems from known-good images or infrastructure code in GitHub, restores data where needed from backups in AWS Backup under the Backup and Recovery Policy, verifies integrity and returns systems to service through an expedited change approval, with heightened monitoring for 14 days.
- 5.7 Notification. Within 24 hours of confirming that customer or personal data was affected, the Security Owner prepares a notification assessment listing who must be told and by when; Executive Management approves it and the messages, counsel reviews regulatory notices, and copies of every notice are attached to the incident record.
- 5.8 Post-incident review. Within five business days of closing a SEV1 or SEV2 incident, the Incident Commander convenes a blameless review covering the timeline, root cause, response timings, impact, what went well and badly, and corrective actions with owners and due dates; the Security Owner approves it and presents SEV1 reviews to Executive Management.
- 5.9 Metrics. Each quarter the Security Owner reports to Executive Management the number of incidents by severity, mean time to acknowledge, contain and resolve, notifications made, overdue corrective actions and trends.
- 5.10 Exercise and plan maintenance. Each year the Security Owner runs a scenario exercise (a leaked token for GitHub, ransomware on a laptop, or a compromised administrator account in AWS and Vercel) and documents decisions and gaps, and each quarter reviews the runbook and contact roster covering security@northwindcloud.example, on-call rotations, Executive Management, counsel, the insurer and support at AWS and Vercel, plus vendor contacts at Supabase, Stripe, Datadog and Slack.
6. Exceptions
Exceptions require the written approval of the Security Owner, a compensating control and an expiry date no more than 12 months away, and are reviewed at each annual policy review. No exception is available to the reporting obligation in 4.1, the communication restriction in 4.7, or any notification required by law or contract.
7. Enforcement
Failing to report a suspected incident, concealing one, destroying evidence, making unauthorised external statements or obstructing responders is a violation of this policy and may result in disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment or contract; unlawful conduct may be referred to law enforcement. Vendors that miss notification obligations face the remedies in their contract.
8. Review Cadence
The Security Owner reviews this policy on a annual basis and after every SEV1 incident, any exercise revealing a material gap, significant changes to Northwind Cloud Inc's infrastructure or reporting channels, and changes in breach-notification law; each review is approved by Priya Natarajan, CEO and recorded in Section 9.
9. Revision History
| Version | Date | Description | Approved by |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 2026-09-02 | Initial release | Priya Natarajan, CEO |
Frequently asked questions
- Who should own the Incident Response Policy?
- In the Policyseed template the Security Owner owns the Incident Response Policy: they maintain the text, run the procedures in section 5 and hold the evidence those procedures produce. The approver you name in the intake signs it, and section 8 sets the review cadence you choose (annual, semi-annual or quarterly).
- Which SOC 2 criteria does the Incident Response Policy address?
- 7 criteria in the Policyseed crosswalk: CC2.2 (Internal communication), CC2.3 (External communication), CC4.2 (Communicating deficiencies), CC7.2 (Monitoring for anomalies), CC7.3 (Evaluating security events), CC7.4 (Responding to incidents) and CC7.5 (Recovering from incidents). Each mapping points at a numbered section of this policy, and the Audit Kit exports the same mapping as an Excel crosswalk with an evidence checklist.
- Is the Incident Response Policy template free to use?
- Yes. The template is Apache-2.0 licensed and the generator renders it in your browser with your company, stack and owner names filled in; nothing is stored server-side. The Audit Kit ($39 one-time) rewrites sections 4 and 5 for your named tools with Claude and adds Word documents, the crosswalk spreadsheet, acknowledgment forms and a review calendar. Refunds are available within 14 days on request. Policyseed provides governance policy templates, not legal advice; the CPA firm performs the examination.
Policyseed provides governance policy templates and AI tailoring. It is not legal advice and not a compliance guarantee. Management adopts the policies; the CPA firm performs the SOC 2 examination.